DOI
https://doi.org/10.25772/QE0E-H643
Defense Date
2010
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy
Department
Biostatistics
First Advisor
Kellie Archer
Abstract
The role of abnormal DNA methylation in the progression of disease is a growing area of research that relies upon the establishment of sound statistical methods. The common method for declaring there is differential methylation between two groups at a given CpG site, as summarized by the difference between proportions methylated db=b1-b2, has been through use of a Filtered Two Sample t-test, using the recommended filter of 0.17 (Bibikova et al., 2006b). In this dissertation, we performed a re-analysis of the data used in recommending the threshold by fitting a mixed-effects ANOVA model. It was determined that the 0.17 filter is not accurate and conjectured that application of a Filtered Two Sample t-test likely leads to loss of power. Further, the Two Sample t-test assumes that data arise from an underlying distribution encompassing the entire real number line, whereas b1 and b2 are constrained on the interval . Additionally, the imposition of a filter at a level signifying the minimum level of detectable difference to a Two Sample t-test likely reduces power for smaller but truly differentially methylated CpG sites. Therefore, we compared the Two Sample t-test and the Filtered Two Sample t-test, which are widely used but largely untested with respect to their performance, to three proposed methods. These three proposed methods are a Beta distribution test, a Likelihood ratio test, and a Bootstrap test, where each was designed to address distributional concerns present in the current testing methods. It was ultimately shown through simulations comparing Type I and Type II error rates that the (unfiltered) Two Sample t-test and the Beta distribution test performed comparatively well.
Rights
© The Author
Is Part Of
VCU University Archives
Is Part Of
VCU Theses and Dissertations
Date of Submission
December 2010