DOI
https://doi.org/10.25772/46X5-HV27
Defense Date
2020
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy
Department
Health Related Sciences
First Advisor
Amy Armstrong
Second Advisor
Christine Reid
Third Advisor
Courtney Holmes
Fourth Advisor
Naomi Wheeler
Abstract
This study examined the extent to which supportive services funded through the federal John H. Chafee Foster Care Independence Program (CFCP) are associated with academic success and employment in foster care youth. Studies suggest that this group experiences poorer employment outcomes (Gypen, Vanderfaeillie, De Maeyer, Belenger, & Van Holen, 2017; Okpych & Courtney, 2014) and earn less money annually (Gypen et al., 2017; Okpych & Courtney, 2014; Pecora, 2012). Despite a 29.4-billion-dollar annual budget for foster care services, individuals with a foster care history struggle after they transition out of care.
The CFCP is intended to help states improve education efforts with foster care youth by providing specific supports to help them earn a GED or High School Diploma, and to obtain employment. This study used 2011-2015 data in the National Youth in Transition Database (NYTD) Services File and Outcomes File to examine associations between the services listed above, GED/graduation, and employment, through three regression analyses. The study found a positive correlation between education level and education outcomes indicating that the more grades a foster care youth completed, the more likely they were to earn an academic credential. The study also revealed three small correlations between employment skills, foster care status, and highest education certification and employment status. These findings indicate that foster care youth were more likely to be employed if they possessed employment skills and had signed themselves out of foster care.
Rights
© The Author
Is Part Of
VCU University Archives
Is Part Of
VCU Theses and Dissertations
Date of Submission
5-20-2020
Included in
Development Studies Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Education Policy Commons, Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Social Welfare Commons, Social Work Commons