DOI

https://doi.org/10.25772/J1AN-EP87

Defense Date

2023

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Fine Arts

Department

Theatre

First Advisor

Dr. Keith Byron Kirk

Second Advisor

Karen Kopryanski

Third Advisor

Dr. Jesse Njus

Abstract

Theatre as an artistic practice has often been celebrated as an art of and for the people, being a modality that in theory the common person has access to learn, explore and experience. In recent years I have become preoccupied with the growing rarification and privileging of this art form, particularly in how it is cognized and taught in the academic world. As such, I set out to investigate the mechanisms at work at levels structural, artistic, and personal that determine how theatre is taught and understood within the western academy.

This thesis seeks to examine and unpack the perceived “correct” way to do and teach theatre as posited by the western academic tradition, and the impact this has on its students. I first unpack Pierre Bourdieu’s theories of Cultural Reproduction and Symbolic Violence and their effect on how theatre is understood and produced. I trace the history of theatre in the western academy and the current state of theatre programs and curriculum. I then draw on interviews with individuals who have studied theatre at the undergraduate level to analyze their experience of theatrical pedagogy. In turn, I examine and theorize pedagogical alternatives to encourage a more accessible and individualized approach to performance pedagogy. The result of this thesis is an unpacking of the formations and systems that make up undergraduate theatre performance studies and an analysis of the potentially harmful effects these systems have on the understanding of undergraduate students.

Rights

© Sim Cleveland Rivers

Is Part Of

VCU University Archives

Is Part Of

VCU Theses and Dissertations

Date of Submission

12-8-2023

Share

COinS