DOI
https://doi.org/10.25772/XHGG-0Q12
Author ORCID Identifier
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1911-0637
Defense Date
2023
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy
Department
Public Policy & Administration
First Advisor
Niraj Verma
Second Advisor
Carolyn Watts
Third Advisor
Sarah Jane Brubaker
Fourth Advisor
I-Shian Suen
Abstract
State correctional departments are responsible for all medical care incarcerated individuals require. Many systems outsource their medical
State correctional departments are responsible for all medical care incarcerated individuals require. Many systems outsource their medical program. Literature indicates that many of these contracts experience significant issues that negatively impact state resources, including both personnel and money.
This dissertation explores the relationship between prison administrators' motivations and the structure, outcomes, efficiencies, and partner conflicts that arise in the contractual process. Using a framework developed from Incomplete Contract Theory, Contracts as Reference Points Theory and the concept of “essential tension,” this dissertation hypothesizes that the administrator’s motivation will impact the likelihood of success, contract efficiencies and partnership conflicts in case of prison medical contracts.
The mixed-method study employs both quantitative and qualitative research methods. Study results indicate a preliminary finding that public administrators’ motivation does correlates with predictable differences in contract design and contract outcomes. States motivated to improve cost control, are more likely to allow the vendor space to manage financial resources but restrict the ability to determine efficient ways to achieve quality, which seems associated with problems in outputs, efficiencies and conflicts.
These findings have implications for contracting and the use of contracts by public administrators. The results suggest that contract completeness is more nuanced than a contract being complete or not complete on the whole. Additionally, the application of completeness and incompleteness in different sections can be an intentional and strategic action on the part of the public administrator that could be used to enhance the usefulness of a complex contract.
. Literature indicates that many of these contracts experience significant issues that negatively impact state resources, including both personnel and money.
This dissertation explores the relationship between prison administrators' motivations and the structure, outcomes, efficiencies, and partner conflicts that arise in the contractual process. Using a framework developed from Incomplete Contract Theory, Contracts as Reference Points Theory and the concept of “essential tension,” this dissertation hypothesizes that the administrator’s motivation will impact the likelihood of success, contract efficiencies and partnership conflicts in case of prison medical contracts.
The mixed-method study employs both quantitative and qualitative research methods. Study results indicate a preliminary finding that public administrators’ motivation does correlates with predictable differences in contract design and contract outcomes. States motivated to improve cost control, are more likely to allow the vendor space to manage financial resources but restrict the ability to determine efficient ways to achieve quality, which seems associated with problems in outputs, efficiencies and conflicts.
These findings have implications for contracting and the use of contracts by public administrators. The results suggest that contract completeness is more nuanced than a contract being complete or not complete on the whole. Additionally, the application of completeness and incompleteness in different sections can be an intentional and strategic action on the part of the public administrator that could be used to enhance the usefulness of a complex contract.
Rights
© The Author
Is Part Of
VCU University Archives
Is Part Of
VCU Theses and Dissertations
Date of Submission
12-14-2023
Included in
Health Policy Commons, Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Public Administration Commons, Public Affairs Commons