Clinical Outcomes of Primary Anterior Esthetic Crowns in Pediatric Dentistry

Author

Jenan Alahmad, Virginia Commonwealth UniversityFollow

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25772/42JQ-7B22

Defense Date

2024

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science in Dentistry

Department

Dentistry

First Advisor

Parthasarathy Madurantakam, D.D.S., M.D.S., Ph.D

Second Advisor

Caroline Carrico, Ph.D.

Third Advisor

Aous Abdulmajeed, D.D.S., Ph.D

Fourth Advisor

Paula L Coates, D.D.S., M.S

Abstract

Clinical Outcomes of Primary Anterior Esthetic Crowns in Pediatric Dentistry - A Prospective Cohort Study

By: Jenan Alahmad, BDS

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Dentistry at Virginia Commonwealth University.

Virginia Commonwealth University, 2024

Thesis Advisor: Parthasarathy Madurantakam, DDS, MDS, PhD

Department of Pediatric Dentistry

BODY

Purpose: This prospective cohort study aimed to compare the effectiveness of restoring maxillary anterior teeth in children (aged 3-6 years) with three different materials: Zirconia Crowns (ZC), Resin Composite Crowns (RC), and Pre-veneered Stainless-Steel Crowns (PVSSC). The study aims to assess the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in children receiving full coronal restorations in primary anterior teeth.

Methods: The study was approved by the VCU Institutional Review Board (HM #20024519). A total of 114 children diagnosed with early childhood caries were enrolled, and 79 teeth were restored with ZC, RC, or PVSSC under general anesthesia. The performance of crowns was assessed based on retention, fracture, color change, marginal integrity, mobility, and periapical pathology, The study utilized the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) to evaluate OHRQoL at 0, 6, and 12 months.

Results: At 6-month follow-up, 79 crowns were evaluated, including 14 PVSSCs (18%), 15 ZCs (19%), and 50 RCs (63%), out of which 97% of crowns remained retentive. Fractures were observed in 13% of crowns and were not significantly associated with the crown type (P=.0925). Gingival inflammation was observed at the site of 9 crowns (11%) and was significantly more common with PVSSCs (29%) and ZC (33%) than RC (0%) (P< .0001). Child Impact scores decreased by an average of 1.6 points (95% CI: -0.75, 3.94) and Family Impact by an average of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.43, 1.22).

Conclusion: Most crowns were retained at a 6-month period with minimal fractures. Gingivitis was primarily observed at the site of the ZC and PVSSC crowns. Enhancement of OHRQoL was observed at the follow-ups for all crown types.

Rights

© The Author

Is Part Of

VCU University Archives

Is Part Of

VCU Theses and Dissertations

Date of Submission

5-9-2024