This work is part of a retrospective collection of 179 electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) from the VCU Libraries pilot ETD system that were designated as available only to VCU users. Please contact us at if you have questions or if you are the author of one of these and would like to release it for online public access.
Non-VCU users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this thesis through interlibrary loan.
Defense Date
2005
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science
Department
Prosthodontics
First Advisor
Dr. David R. Burns
Abstract
Statement of Problem. Resin-based cements have become increasingly more popular for the cementation of prefabricated endodontic dowels due to their superior retention. The manufacturer of Panavia F 2.0 suggests that the product be stored under refrigerated conditions while not in use, however, there is no literature to support such a rationale. It is possible that these storage/use temperature cycling events may have a deleterious effect on the retention of prefabricated endodontic dowels. Purpose. The purpose of this in-vitro study was to investigate the retention of Panavia F 2.0 used to lute prefabricated endodontic dowels after the Panavia F 2.0 system has been kept under different storage conditions. Material and Methods. Sixty-four extracted human central incisors were selected to undergo root canal therapy and dowel retention testing. Four separate Panavia F 2.0 cement systems were placed under 4 different storage conditions for a period of 6 months, until retention testing was initiated. In the first group, the Panavia F 2.0 was stored under the manufacturer's suggested refrigerated conditions, at a constant temperature of 40°F. In the second group, the Panavia F 2.0 was stored under a constant 90°F temperature. In the third group, the Panavia F 2.0 was stored under room temperature conditions of 70°F. The fourth group attempted to mimic clinical usage conditions with the Panavia F 2.0 being cycled from refrigeration at 40°F for 22 hours/day to 2 hours/day of room temperature at 70°F 5 days per week for the duration of the 6-month storage condition period. Results. Stress values were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA. A Tukey's HSD multiple comparison analysis of the dowel retention strengths indicated that the group stored at 90°F resulted in the lowest retention. This group was significantly lower than all other groups' retention strength (p Conclusions. Within the limitations of this study, the storage of Panavia F 2.0 at either room temperature or cycling between refrigeration and room temperature yields similar dowel retention values. However, the storage of Panavia F 2.0 at temperatures of 90°F for prolonged periods causes poor dowel retention. Clinical Implications The results of this study do not support the necessity of storing Panavia F 2.0 under refrigerated conditions between clinical uses, if used within six months. However, the storage of the Panavia F 2.0 cementation system at temperatures of 90°F for prolonged periods will affect dowel retention and is therefore not advisable.
Rights
© The Author
Is Part Of
VCU University Archives
Is Part Of
VCU Theses and Dissertations
Date of Submission
June 2008
VCU Only:
Off Campus Download
Comments
Part of Retrospective ETD Collection, restricted to VCU only.