Authors

Martin B. Keller , M.D., Brown University
James P. McCullough , Ph.D., Virginia Commonwealth University, The Unipolar Mood Disorders Institute
Daniel N. Klein , Ph.D., State University of New York at Stony Brook
Bruce Arnow , Ph.D., Stanford University
David L. Dunner , M.D., University of Washington - Seattle Campus
Alan J. Gelenberg , M.D., University of Arizona
John C. Markowitz , M.D., Cornell University Medical College
Charles B. Nemeroff , M.D., Ph.D., Emory University School of Medicine
James M. Russell M.D., University of Texas Medical Branch
Michael E. Thase , M.D., University of Pittsburgh - Main Campus
Madhukar H. Trivedi , M.D., University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Janice A. Blalock , Ph.D., University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Frances E. Borian , R.N., Bristol-Myers Squibb
Darlene N. Jody , M.D., Bristol-Myers Squibb
Charles DeBattista , D.M.H., M.D., Stanford University
Lorrin M. Koran , M.D., Stanford University
Alan F. Schatzberg , M.D., Stanford University
Jan Fawcett , M.D., Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center
Robert M.A. Hirschfeld , M.D., University of Texas Medical Branch
Gabor Keitner , M.D., Brown University
Ivan Miller , Ph.D., Brown University
James H. Kocsis , M.D., Cornell University Medical College
Susan G. Kornstein , M.D., Virginia Commonwealth University
Rachel Manber , Ph.D., University of Arizona
Philip T. Ninan , M.D., Emory University School of Medicine
Barbara Rothbaum , Ph.D., Emory University School of Medicine
A. John Rush , M.D., University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Dina Vivian , Ph.D., State University of New York at Stony Brook
John Zajecka , M.D., Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center

Document Type

Article

Original Publication Date

2000

Journal/Book/Conference Title

The New England Journal of Medicine

Volume

342

Issue

20

First Page

1462

Last Page

1470

DOI of Original Publication

10.1056/NEJM200005183422001

Comments

Originally published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200005183422001

This article was updated on July 19, 2001, at NEJM.org. The correction was published as follows:

A Comparison of Nefazodone, the Cognitive Behavioral-Analysis System of Psychotherapy, and Their Combination for the Treatment of Chronic Depression (Original Article, N Engl J Med2000:342;1462 1470) . On page 1464, the definition of response and remission that begins on line 18 in the left-hand column should have read, “Remission was defined a priori as an HRSD score of no more than 8 at both week 10 and week 12 for the analysis of those who completed the 12-week protocol, and at end point for the analysis of the modified intention-to-treat sample. A satisfactory therapeutic response was defined as a reduction in the HRSD score by at least 50 percent from base line to week 10 and week 12, with a total score of 15 or less at these times but of more than 8 at week 10, week 12, or both, for the analysis of those who completed the study, and at end point for the analysis of the modified intention-to-treat sample.”

Date of Submission

January 2015

Abstract

Background

Patients with chronic forms of major depression are difficult to treat, and the relative efficacy of medications and psychotherapy is uncertain.

Methods

We randomly assigned 681 adults with a chronic nonpsychotic major depressive disorder to 12 weeks of outpatient treatment with nefazodone (maximal dose, 600 mg per day), the cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy (16 to 20 sessions), or both. At base line, all patients had scores of at least 20 on the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (indicating clinically significant depression). Remission was defined as a score of 8 or less at weeks 10 and 12. For patients who did not have remission, a satisfactory response was defined as a reduction in the score by at least 50 percent from base line and a score of 15 or less. Raters were unaware of the patients’ treatment assignments.

Results

Of the 681 patients, 662 attended at least one treatment session and were included in the analysis of response. The overall rate of response (both remission and satisfactory response) was 48 percent in both the nefazodone group and the psychotherapy group, as compared with 73 percent in the combined-treatment group (P

Conclusions

Although about half of patients with chronic forms of major depression have a response to short-term treatment with either nefazodone or a cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy, the combination of the two is significantly more efficacious than either treatment alone.

Rights

From The New England Journal of Medicine, Keller, M.B., McCullough, J.P., Klein, D.N., et al., A comparison of nefazodone, the cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy, and their combination for the treatment of chronic depression, Vol. 342, Page 1462, Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. Reprinted with permission.

Is Part Of

VCU Psychology Publications

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS