Loading...
Original Publication Date
2026
Document Type
Video
Abstract
In American education, leadership decisions and institutional policies fundamentally dictate "who gets to grieve." For Black boys, emotional expressions of loss, trauma, and stress are frequently misread through disciplinary lenses rather than recognized as a need for care. This research explores the intersection of educational leadership and grief fluency, arguing that the systematic suppression of Black male emotionality is a leadership failure rather than a student deficit.
Drawing on W.E.B. DuBois’s "double consciousness" and the contemporary frameworks of Dr. John Onwuchekwa, the study critiques current Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) standards, such as Virginia’s Standard 2, for universalizing emotional development while overlooking the racialized policing of Black boys' emotions. When institutions lack "grief articulacy," they normalize a hidden curriculum where Black pain is pathologized and punished.
Policy Recommendations:
The research advocates for a significant reduction in school counselor ratios, moving toward a "250:1" or "emotional infrastructure" model. By treating counselors as emotional educators rather than crisis triage, schools can ensure that Black boys are met with structural care. This approach aligns with House Bill 181, seeking to transform the "disciplinary silence" into a "radical turn" toward intimacy and community healing.
Keywords
Educational leadership, Grief fluency, Black masculinity, Institutional policy, Social and Emotional Learning (SEL), School counseling
Rights
Copyright © 2026 A. D. Gabriel Driver. All rights reserved.
Comments
Presented in the Integrating Emotional Wellbeing into Artistic and Educational Practice session.