Home > JPER > Vol. 6 (2019-2021) > No. 1
Keywords
Prison education, prison college programs, prison education administration
Abstract
U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson’s 1967 Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice called for a massive increase in teachers prepared to assist in the delivery of academic programs for incarcerated people. “Substantial subsidies are needed to recruit needed specialists,” they wrote, “and to provide them with the training required to make them effective in their complex and challenging task.” Half a century later, the persistent educational deficits and need for empowering postsecondary academic programs in prisons across the United States and the world are being addressed by a wide range of responses from specialists in higher education, corrections, and research. Too often overlooked, however, are the perspectives of those specialists whose expertise comes in part from lived experience: directly affected people leading successful and meaningful interventions in rehabilitation and reentry. This paper examines the development and administration of Hudson Link for Higher Education in Prison, an in-prison college program run and staffed primarily by its own formerly incarcerated graduates. The importance of foregrounding the voices of directly affected people by placing them in positions of true leadership and authority – not merely as symbolic gestures or tokens – in Hudson Link’s program design and implementation is explained. Finally, the paper explores the impact of lived experience on managing and teaching in the program, as well as strategies for academic partners looking to best support interventions led by those who are closest to the problem and, in turn, closest to the solution.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Austria, R. & Peterson, J. (2017, January). Credible messenger mentoring for justice-involved youth. The Pinkerton Report. [Online report]. Retrieved from The Pinkerton Foundation website: http://www. thepinkertonfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Pinkerton-Papers-credible-messenger-monitoring. pdf
Fine, M., Torre, M., Boudin, K., Bowen, I., Clark, J., Hylton, D., Martinez, M., Missy, Roberts, R., Smart, P., & Upegui, D. (2001, September). Changing Minds: The Impact of College in a Maximum-Security Prison: Effects on Women in Prison, the Prison Environment, Reincarceration Rates and Post-Release Outcomes. Collaborative Research by The Graduate Center of the City University of New York and Women in Prison at the Bedford Hills Correctional Facility. [Online report]. Retrieved from Prison Policy Initiative website: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/changing_minds.pdf
McDowell, L. (2012). How Incarcerated Undergraduates Use Higher Education to Make Sense of Their Lives (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford). Retrieved from https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/ uuid%3A33deafb7-e665-4d57-88ba-20866b7ad317
National Research Council. (2014) The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/ pdffiles1/nij/42.pdf
The Correctional Association of New York. (2009). Education from the Inside, Out: The Multiple Benefits of College Programs in Prison. [Online report]. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b- 2c07e2a9e02851fb387477/t/5c4f6bd37924e83934430aca/1548708819091/2009+Benefits+of+Higher+ Education+in+Prisons.pdf
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Pub.L. 103-322, 108 Stat. 1796 (1994).
Included in
Adult and Continuing Education Commons, Higher Education Commons, Prison Education and Reentry Commons