•  
•  

Art Inquiries

Publication Ethics Statement

Art Inquiries is committed to ethical publication practices and expects all submitting authors to uphold the standards of publication ethics set out by the Commission on Publication Ethics (COPE). Any case of ethical misconduct will be treated seriously and in accordance with the COPE guidelines. See https://publicationethics.org/.

Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence:

The work submitted to Art Inquiries is expected to be the author’s/peer-reviewers’/editors' own work. Authors are permitted to use generative A.I. for spell check and grammatical help (using apps like Grammarly or the Spell-Check Feature in Word, for example), but all research design, data collection, literature reviews, and image analysis, interpretation, and substantive intellectual contributions should be performed independently by the authors. The use of generative A.I. in the authorship of a manuscript is not allowed and constitutes a breach of academic integrity. It is the responsibility of each author to fully disclose how A.I. may have been used as a data-collection tool, and/or when A.I. artwork or technology is the subject of the research itself. The use of A.I. or L.L.M.s must be acknowledged by a general statement of such use at the beginning of an article/review. These uses of A.I. or L.L.M.s must be acknowledged by a general statement of such use at the beginning of an article/review, and the model must be cited according to Chicago-Turabian style. Example of a footnote: 1. Text generated by ChatGPT, OpenAI, March 7, 2023,     https://chat.openai.com/chat. Peer reviewers and editors should not use generative A.I. to create their assessments, as it undermines the integrity of the review process. Under no circumstances should A.I. be used to author a peer-review report. Any authors of editors who violate these terms will not have their work published or considered.