•  
  •  
 

Author ORCID Identifier

0009-0002-4112-5451

Abstract

In education scholarship, authors have increasingly called to center queer joy to disrupt the conventional deficit model that normally accompanies queer communities. However, in this paper, I argue that an exclusive emphasis on joy may risk instituting and normalizing a happiness duty that marginalizes negative affects and subjects. I propose queer grief not as an opposite, but as a constitutive shadow of joy. Drawing on theories of queer, trans, and crip negativity and the studies on loss, grief, and mourning, I critique the imperative to mobilize affect solely for future utility and teleological meaning. I contend that such mobilization-driven frameworks inadvertently render unproductive states, such as lingering silence, depression, and refusal, unrepresentable and ethically and politically void within educational inquiry. Instead, I advocate for an ethics of staying with grief in the study of education. By reclaiming negativity, this paper complicates the notion of holisticness in research and education, urging scholars not to look away from the arts of living through grief which remain illegible to the logic of joy itself.

Methodological Approach

Theoretical or Conceptual

1

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.