•  
  •  
 

Author ORCID Identifier

0009-0001-2625-0222

Abstract

North Carolina’s Parents’ Bill of Rights (NC-PBOR) requires school counselors to disclose sensitive student information to parents, creating profound legal-ethical dilemmas. This study examines how counselors navigate these mandates through interviews, surveys, and arts-based analysis. Findings show counselors experience institutional betrayal, ethical precarity, and emotional exhaustion, yet also engage in subtle resistance through strategic ambiguity, relational buffering, and quiet noncompliance. Methodologically, we integrate coding, poetic inquiry, and visual confection to capture affect, embodiment, and contradiction often missed by conventional analysis. By foregrounding emotion and multiplicity, we contribute to assemblage-informed policy studies and queer qualitative inquiry, while bearing witness to the human cost of legislation that constrains care.

Drawing on assemblage theory and queer inquiry, we analyze how counselors experience the policy as a site of betrayal, grief, and resistance. Through emotion coding and arts-based interpretation, we document how these professionals hold space for LGBTQ+ students while confronting laws that demand disclosure, surveillance, and silence. Our findings show that arts-based methods do more than represent emotion—they activate ethical insight and analytic depth, offering a humanizing lens on the entanglement of policy, identity, and professional responsibility.

Methodological Approach

Qualitative

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.